It would be great if either of the stories had pressed their sources a
little more to explain exactly how these officials—led, reportedly, by
Stephen Miller—thought that busing migrants to those cities would be a
punishment in any way. Did Stephen think that releasing busloads of
migrants in San Francisco or New York would instantly cause the city to
collapse into a dystopian, crime-ridden hellscape? Did he think that
they would eat all the famous New York pizza?A premise like
“busing migrants to San Francisco will punish Nancy Pelosi” is not
self-explanatory. I do not immediately understand the mechanism by which
releasing a tired, huddled mass of immigrants in cities with massive
populations—and cities where asylum approval rates are much higher—would punish their representatives.The release of these migrants to the streets without any support, of
course, is vile in itself. On Christmas Day last year (gotta love this
administration’s Christian charity), NPR reported
that ICE had released “approximately 400 migrants near the Greyhound
bus terminal with no apparent plan in place for the men, women and
children” over the past few days. Those migrants were left “completely
reliant on generous strangers who have been showing up in droves to
distribute food, water and blankets as temperatures drop into the 40s.”But
I would like for the papers and the anonymous officials involved—many
of whom are likely to be involved in other vile immigrations
decisions—to have to spell this out. It doesn’t serve readers to leave
that question unanswered, to leave the prospect open that these
officials thought just the presence of immigrants in these cities would
harm their residents. Those migrants can’t vote; the vast, vast majority
of harm experienced by releasing them on the streets is experienced by
the migrants themselves, not the communities around them. I do not
understand how this evil act was supposed to translate into political
pressure on Pelosi, or representatives in New York or Chicago, unless
what they actually thought would happen is that crimey migrants would do
a bunch of migranty crimes in those cities, because they are racist.This
is just the kind of thing that I might interrogate a little more.
Otherwise, the framing is left as “the presence of migrants in cities
will be bad for those cities.” And in the end, that just does Stephen
Miller’s work for him.
its not racist to think that immigrants are more likely to do crimes because immigrant is not a race and moreover immigrants cause a strain on the system is not a controversial opinion or else we wouldnt have to worry about refugee crises this not up to your usual standard of quality articles to reference op